Hassocks Parish Council


You are summoned to a virtual meeting of the Parish Council on 13th April 2021
at 7.30 pm

Members of the public are encouraged to come to the meetings and there is an opportunity for them to address the Council relating to the non-confidential items on the published agenda.

If you wish to attend, this virtual meeting please email the info@hassocks-pc.gov.uk before 4pm on 13th April 2021 to be sent an electronic invitation before 6pm on the 13th April 2021.



1.1 To Accept Apologies for Absence.


2.1       Disclosure by Councillors of personal interests in matters on the agenda, and whether the Councillor regards their interest as prejudicial under the terms of the Code of Conduct.


3.1       To accept the minutes of the:

Parish Council meeting 9th March 2021

Up to fifteen minutes will be available to allow for the public to make representations, answer questions or give evidence in respect of any item of business included in the agenda, in accordance with Standing Orders.


To accept the following Minutes

5.1       Planning Committee – to agree the minutes for 15th March 2021

5.2       Policy Resources & Communications Committee –to note the minutes for the 2nd March 2021

5.3      Grounds & Environment Committee to note the minutes for the 11th March 2021.

5.4        Neighbourhood Plan Committee – to note the minutes for the 18th March 2021.


6.1       To approve the Financial Report and authorise the list of payments in the sum of £15,463.88 for the period ending 28th February 2021 set out in Appendix 1. Please click here for Appendix 1.


7.1       District Councillors’ Report

7.2       County Councillor Report

7.3       Rail Matters.

7.4       Youth Initiatives

7.5       Police report

7.6       Report from Councillors on meetings of outside bodies where the Council is represented.


8.1       Current matters (oral report)


9.1      Insurance – The Councils current insurance arrangement with Axa is due to expire on the 31st May 2021. Parish Council insurance is a specialised market with limited providers therefore it is proposed that a similar approach to that taken previously and seek to test the market utilising a specialist insurance broker with an option to consider entering into a 3 year term agreement.

Our current broker Came & Company managed our previous insurance tender and will be approached to seek quotations from the market, it is anticipated that this approach will enable the Council to secure best value not only in terms of comprehensiveness of cover provided by the respective policies  but also the value of the premium.

Members are requested to consider and approve the proposed approach and the principle of entering into a term agreement with the successful company. The outcome of the exercise will be brought back to Council to consider.

9.2       Remote meetings – As a result of the Coronavirus pandemic last year the government introduced legislation to enable Council meetings to be conducted remotely, however this legislation was for a fixed period of time and Government have determined not to extend this element of the legislation. The impact of this decision is that the legislation permitting remote meetings will cease on the 7th May 2021. The Council will therefore be required to revert back to in person meetings after this date.

The impact of this legislative change will therefore impact on this Council and some members may feel less comfortable at reverting back to in person meetings at this time as any social distancing may be difficult in the Council chamber particularly for Full Council and Grounds & Environment Committees where there are a larger number of attendees present.

The Council is currently scheduled to hold its Annual Parish Meeting and its Annual Council meeting on the 11th May 2021 therefore falling after the legislation change and therefore would be required to be held in person if this date was retained. It is suggested that members consider bringing forward both these meetings forward to Tuesday the 4th May 2021 to enable those meetings to be held remotely. The Council will then need to give further consideration as to how it intends to operate its meetings going forward in line with the revised guidance.

9.3.     Banking – This is to advise members that our current provider’s local branch of Barclays in Burgess Hill will be closing permanently from 21st June 2021. Members have previously considered and agreed in principle to look at alternative bank providers. It is proposed to move over to an online provider (Unity Trust Bank) to operate our day to day account which specialises in providing banking services for parish councils and charities which will retain the need for joint signatories (two authorised signatories) to authorise any payments To facilitate this move the Council will need to designate some additional signatories to our current authorised members or draw up a revised group of signatories for this new account.

As the account will operate solely on-line it is important that any signatories are comfortable with using technology. It is suggested that the Council consider having a pool of say up to six signatories for the on-line account. A protocol will be drafted to enable the new processes to align with the internal control framework in place within the council before going live.

9.4.      Electoral Review: The Local Boundary Commission are currently undertaking a consultation on the Ward Boundaries for Mid Sussex. A 10 week consultation has commenced with a closing date of 31st May 2021. (Appendix 2) One of the options being considered is to reduce the current number of elected members from 54 to 48. Members are requested to consider whether the Parish Council wishes to put in a formal representation as part of this consultation. The tables set out below are an illustration of the impact on Hassocks if they were identified as one of the potential parishes to be affected.


Current Member Representation within the MSDC District

District 2021 2027
Number of councillors 54 54
Overall electorate


115,931 129,389
Average electorate per councillor 2,147 2,396

Potential Representation if the MSDC membership was reduced

District 2021 2027
Number of councillors 48 48
Overall electorate


115,931 129,389
Average electorate per councillor 2415 2695


Parish Based on retaining 3 members Based on reducing to 2 members
HASSOCKS 2021 2027 2021 2027
Number of councillors 3 3 2 2


6,554 7,669 6,554 7,669
Average electorate per councillor 2,185 2,556 3,277 3,835

Member’s views are sought.

9.5.      Parklands Copse – Flood initiative

Grounds & Environment considered a report from representatives of the Flood Working group and recommended the approval and the installation of a debris dam within Parklands Copse (subject to survey) which is in the ownership of the parish council. The proposal will assist in reducing and managing the potential risk of flooding within the village. Grounds & Environment Committee also sought to request full council to approve the release of funds to enable the survey to be completed by the Ouse and Adur Rivers Trust (OART).

GE20/74.1RESOLVED to approve the construction of debris dams within the reference area of Parklands Copse.

GE20/74.2 RESOLVED TO RECOMMEND to Full Council that funds are made available from General Reserves for the expenditure of £450 in payment for the survey and costings to be carried out by OART, with provision for funding for potential future costs relating to materials.

Subsequent to the initial report being considered by Grounds & Environment Committee further information has been obtained in respect of the overall cost of delivery of the scheme if it were to progress. A report is set out in Appendix 3 estimating that the overall cost of the scheme would be circa £1,000 which would include the survey and all construction materials, the majority of labour would be provided by volunteers via HKD.

If members are minded to approve the initial funding (£450) as requested by Grounds & Environment Committee and the survey supports the feasibility of the site utilisation. To enable the scheme to progress and programmed in without the need to come back to Council for further funding, it is suggested members may wish to consider allocating an overall budget of £1,000 in line with the attached report. Member’s views are sought.

Any funds drawn down would be from General reserves.

9.6.   Committee Membership – Members are requested to consider a request from Cllr Berggreen to sit on the Neighbourhood Plan Committee.

Member’s views are sought

10. Urgent Matters at the discretion of the Chairman for noting and/or inclusion on a future agenda.

11. Date of next meeting TBA

EXCLUSION OF PUBLIC AND PRESS In view of the confidential nature of the business about to be transacted Councillors will be referred to the Confidential agenda If any members of the public or press are present they will be requested to withdraw from the meeting.

During this meeting members of the public may film or record the Committee and officers from the public area only providing it does not disrupt the meeting. The Confidential section of the meeting may not be filmed or recorded. If a member of the public objects to being recorded, the person(s) filming must stop doing so until that member of the public has finished speaking. The use of social media is permitted but members of the public are requested to switch their mobile devices to silent for the duration of the meeting.

Please Note
All members of the public are welcome to attend virtual meetings of the Parish Council and its Committees.

Item 4 – a period of 15 minutes will be set aside for the public statements and questions relating to the published non-confidential business of the Meeting.

It may be necessary to consider particular items in confidential session and where this arises, these items will be considered at the end of the agenda.

Appendix 2
What is an electoral review?

Our electoral review will recommend new electoral arrangements for Mid Sussex District Council. We will propose:

  • the total number of councillors elected to the council in the future;
  • the number of wards;
  • the number of councillors representing each ward;
  • ward boundaries; and
  • the names of wards.

How to get involved

This is a public consultation and we welcome views from individuals and organisations across Mid Sussex on where they think new ward boundaries should be drawn.

We are minded to recommend that 48 councillors should be elected to Mid Sussex District Council in the future.

This is six fewer than the current number of councillors.

We are now inviting proposals to help us draw up a pattern of wards to accommodate 48 councillors.

In drawing up new electoral wards, we must balance three legal criteria, namely:

  • to deliver electoral equality: where each councillor represents roughly the same number of electors as others across the district;
  • that the pattern of wards should, as far as possible, reflect the interests and identities of local communities;
  • that the electoral arrangements should provide for effective and convenient local government.

We will treat all submissions equally, and judge each case on its merits and against the legal criteria.

If you wish to put forward a view, we would also urge you to ensure that evidence supports your submission.

For example, if you wish to argue that two areas should be included in the same electoral ward, make sure you tell us why they should be together, providing evidence about community facilities, ties, organisations, and amenities, rather than simply asserting that they belong together.

There is more advice on our website about how you can get involved in the consultation.

Our website features technical guidance that explains the process and our policies, as well as guidance on how to take part in each part of the process.

We have also set up a webpage dedicated to the review of Mid Sussex, where you can find all the relevant information.

You can also access interactive maps of the current ward boundaries across Mid Sussex on our specialist consultation portal. The portal also allows you to comment and upload documents directly to the site.

Appendix 3

Natural Flood Management Measures in Parklands Copse


Following the serious flooding incident in the centre of Hassocks in October 2020 the Grounds and Environment Committee set up a Flood Working Group with the remit to review the evidence of flood incidence and risk in the parish and the potential solutions and make recommendations for future action.  The Working Group is chaired by Cllr Frances Gaudencio and attended by Parish Councillors Claire Tester, Bill Hatton, Kristian Berggreen and Alex Simmons; County Councillor Kirsty Lord; District Councillor Benedict Dempsey; HKD Transition representative Juliet Merrifield and Ouse and Adur River Trust (OART) representative Peter King.

As part of this work the Group reviewed the flood interventions proposed in reports by WSCC and HKD Transition and considered that the project where the Parish Council could add most value and make early progress on was carrying out ‘Natural Flood Management’ (NFM) measures in Parklands Copse, which is owned by the Parish Council.  The extent of the land ownership is shown below.  The NFM measures would take the form of one or more ‘debris dams’ placed in the stream, similar to those installed by HKD in Lag Wood as shown below.

To see the images of the map and debris dam please click here.

Grounds and Environment Committee

A report was taken to Grounds and Environment Committee on 11th March 2021 which explained the proposed project.  It is intended that the dam(s) will de-synchronise the flows near to where the two channels meet (from Butchers Wood and Parklands Copse). Slowing the flow in this location will further reduce the amount of water meeting Spitalford Bridge in the centre of the village, creating additional capacity within the culvert. This needs to be calculated but this should facilitate additional drainage from the road surface water drains which often back up once the level of water in the channel overtops the invert level of the pipes from the road. It is expected that this project would complement the work already done in Lag Wood in slowing the movement of water into the village centre.

The Committee was invited to approve the construction of debris dams in Parklands Copse and to support the undertaking of a survey by OART involving a walkover survey of the stream, map the suitable locations for installation of the debris dams, provide a plan and cost estimate for materials required and source these if necessary.  Members were invited to consider supporting the expenditure of £450 for the survey plus potential future costs for materials.

The Committee was very supportive of the project.  It was agreed that this was a low cost scheme which has been shown to be effective in reducing flooding whilst working with nature.  However, some concern was expressed over the risk of damage to the flora and fauna along the banks of the stream in Parklands Copse.  It was noted that it had been observed by Peter King that the banks of the stream are quite steep which would then reduce much of this risk.   Cllr Gaudencio also noted that this concern could be included in the remit provided to OART when undertaking the survey. Cllr Weir requested that any rise in water level was planned so that it did not affect the bridges in Parklands Copse in any way.

After a full discussion it was resolved to approve the construction of debris dams within the reference area of Parklands Copse; and to recommend to Full Council that funds are made available from General Reserves for the expenditure of £450 in payment for the survey and costings to be carried out by OART, with provision for funding for potential future costs relating to materials.

Request to Full Council for Project Budget
Since the Grounds and Environment Committee further information has been received from OART.  To address the concerns raised by some Committee members it was clarified that the top of the debris dam would be below the level of the bank top so all water would be contained within the stream and not be encouraged out onto the surrounding land, as such there would be no impact other than having deeper water in the channel. The footpath and land within Parklands Copse would not get wetter as a result of installing the debris dams.

It was also clarified that the works would require Ordinary Watercourse Consent (OWC) from Mid Sussex District Council – a technical consent process required for any works which effect the flow of a watercourse.  There is a fee payable to MSDC for this consent and some costs associated with preparing documents for the application. There would also be some costs for materials to construct the dam(s).  Whilst it is anticipated that the horizontal timber can be sourced from the woodland itself, the vertical stakes will need to be purchased.  The intention is that the works will be carried out by HKD Transition volunteers so there will be no labour costs.  Given the involvement of volunteers and the need to maintain momentum on the project, it would be helpful if Full Council could allocate a budget for the full project rather than just the survey.

Overall OART consider the project costs including the survey, OWC and materials would be approximately £950.  Allowing some contingency, a budget of £1,000 is considered reasonable to complete the project.

Council is asked to allocate a budget of £1,000 from reserves to the project for Natural Flood Management measures in Parklands Copse.


Minutes of the virtual meeting of the Parish Council held on 13th April 2021 at 7.30pm.

Attendees: Parish Councillors Ian Weir, Sue Hatton, Kristian Berggreen, Frank Rylance, Frances Gaudencio, Bob Brewer. Claire Tester, Leslie Campbell, Bill Hatton, Nick Owens, David Bunting and Carolyn Barton.

Parish Clerk: Ian Cumberworth

Visiting Member(s): Kirsty Lord


PC20/121        APOLOGIES   Cllr Jane Baker        Cllr Alex Simmons


Disclosure by Councillors of personal interests in matters on the agenda, and whether the Councillor regards their interest as prejudicial under the terms of the Code of Conduct. – None

PC20/123        MINUTES

The minutes of the meeting held on the 9th March 2021 were accepted as a true and accurate record of the meeting.


One member of the public was present who wished to speak but was unfortunately unable to do so as the item referenced was not on the agenda. The public are only permitted to speak on items on the published agenda.

PC20/125        MINUTES

To agree the Minutes of the Planning Committee 15th March 2021.

To note the minutes Policy Resources & Communications Committee for the 2nd March 2021.

To note the minutes for the Grounds & Environment Committee 11th March 2021.

To note the minutes of the Neighbourhood Plan Committee 18th March 2021.

PC20/126        FINANCE

Members considered the finance reports and the supporting bank statements and reviewed the payment list. The Finance report and payments totalling £15,463.88 for the period ending 28th February 2021 were considered and APPROVED.

PC20/127        Reports

127.1  District Councillors reports: – Cllr Sue Hatton (SH) advised members that MSDC sport centres were likely to need continued financial support from MSDC due to the extended closure as a result of the pandemic.

MSDC is currently going through a boundary/ward review which is currently out for public consultation. This item appears later on in this agenda as item 9.4.

SH indicated that a potential development site (Nation Tyres, Keymer Road) has come forward and the developer is in the process of undertaking some limited consultation on their proposal at present. MSDC ward members recently attended a virtual meeting to discuss the proposals. This site had previously been identified as a potential site for development as part of the Parish Councils original Neighbourhood Plan but was subsequently removed from the adopted version as the then owner of the site was not prepared to fund a flood survey at that time and without one the site had no prospect of development.

Taylor Wimpey have secured the strategic site north of Clayton Mills and it is anticipated that progress on this scheme will commence shortly.

MSDC will be required to cease virtual meetings after 7th May if the government do not change their current position. There is a high court case progressing currently challenging whether remote meetings can continue. If remote meetings are required to stop this could have implications as to where and how the Council can hold meetings and maintain social distancing.

SH updated members on the proposed wilding being undertaken by MSDC and the issues at Shepherds Walk. In light of the public disquiet that the site would be prevented from being used as informal activity space MSDC have reduced the area to be wilded. The issues regarding this initiative seemed to have occurred as a result of communication issues where a number of residents were unaware of MSDC proposals. Residents did not seem to object to the principle of rewilding it was more the lack of communication surrounding the initiative and the use of that particular site.

127.2  County Councillor – Cllr Lord indicated there were no meetings scheduled with the run up to the elections.

Cllr Lord provided an update on some highways issues in relation to:

Beaconhurst flooding that appears to relate to the East Sussex border (ESCC) and not West Sussex (WSCC). ESCC are to arrange cleaning of the drains.

Over recent months some flooding has occurred in the Quadrant and Ockley Lane involving some temporary works being undertaken by utility companies’ follow ups are being carried out to confirm that permanent repairs have been concluded to ensure the issue does not reoccur.

Keymer Road – a ridge has formed in a section of road near the station where pedestrians will need to be careful when crossing. A temporary emergency patching repair is scheduled in the near future and it is anticipated that the stretch of road up to Stonepound crossroads will be resurfaced in the 2021/22 financial year.

Cllr Lord indicated that she had also attended a meeting with MSDC ward members regarding the development proposed at the National Tyres site.

Woodands Mead planning permission approved and a contractor has been appointed.

County are consulting on the potential closure of 3 youth centres within Burgess Hill as county are proposing to withdraw service from these sites and focus on a hub in Haywards Heath.

Downlands school places issues have not affected children in Hassocks but twelve children from neighbouring villages missed out.

Cllr Lord indicated that this would be her last meeting before the election and will see what the outcome is on the 6th May.

Parish Council members took the opportunity to thank Cllr Lord for the positive working relationship and communications developed during her tenure which was appreciated by all.

127.3  Rail matters – Members were advised that in March there were 135 train cancellations of which 99 were cancelled outright and 36 ran but failed to stop at Hassocks.

127.4  Youth Initiatives – Cllr Gaudencio advised Members that the lead youth worker at Hassocks Youth club has resigned from the role which has now been filled by the deputy.

Hassocks Youth Projects is not able to fund raise for Sussex Clubs for Young people as is not the primary role of this entity (HYP)

Progress on setting up HYP is good and a website is currently being developed, it is at this point anticipated HYP will make funding bids for their own initiatives which have been informed by consultation within the community (schools etc.)

Cllr Bailey acknowledged the work the Parish Council has done in undertaking improvements within the park resulting in unpresented use of the park and should be proud of what’s been achieved for the youths.

127.5  Police matters – nothing to report.

127.6  Report from Councillors on meetings of outside bodies where the Council is represented – Cllr Kristian Berggreen informed members that he attended the MSALC – AGM the main focus of the meeting was to consider and revise the constitution. With the reconstituted WSALC group it is intended to call a meeting with local clerks to update them on the emerging arrangements.

Trevor Leggo formerly of SSALC will be employed 2 days a week to provide governance advice support to parish/town councils and Mulberry & Co will provide a   training programme.

Cllr S Hatton attended the Adastra Hall Management Committee and advised members that they had been successful in securing some covid support grants that have supported the hall during closure and they are currently working towards reopening as soon as practical.

PC20/128  CHAIRMANS REPORT – Cllr Weir informed members that a letter had been received from Juliet Merrifield (HKD Transition) seeking the Parish Councils support as part of a national campaign ‘No mow May’ organised by the charity Plant life and may wish to consider setting aside a small area in Adastra Park. HKD are to promote and encourage Hassocks residents to participate in the No mow May event.

Alongside this HKD were also looking to work with WSCC on community road verges initiatives and have identified a potential trial site on Keymer Road at Beaconsfield. This would mean WSCC not mowing these verges and plant surveys being undertaken in April and July with the verges being cut in August.

Members were supportive of the initiative being proposed by HKD and WSCC in principle and after extensive discussion determined that a more structured approach should be taken to identify potential sites within the parish and the viability of allocating an area within the park. Potential sites mentioned during discussions included County Council land on the A273, land at the side of Clayton Mill development, east side of Ockley lane opposite the Thatched Inn next to the fields.

Due to the length of time allocated to this discussion members agreed to refer the matter to Grounds & Environment Committee to consider properly and to identify potential sites and to liaise with WSCC where necessary and consider the operational impact on the park if an area is to be set aside for this initiative.

Cllr Weir advised members that he had recently attended a site visit with Network rail regarding the railway crossing/tunnel at Woodside Road, it was confirmed that the tunnel will be 3.3m wide and approx. 2.75 m high which would be adequate for bridleway access if the new footpath were to be upgraded. It was anticipated that works would commence September 2021 with a completion by April 2022. Network Rail are also likely to seek a closure of the crossing in the near future.

Members discussed how this information is being communicated to the community and although some flyers have previously been distributed by Network Rail the view was expressed that they should be approached and requested to place an article in the local village magazines informing the community of the timeline for the scheme and the impact on train services and access to the footpath.

Cllr Weir informed members that he had received a response from Andrew Griffiths (MP) as he had written to him in a personal capacity expressing his disappointment that the government chose not to extend the legislation in relation to remote meetings beyond the 7th May 2021. The MP indicated that in a personal capacity he supported flexibility being retained to enable remote meetings.


129.1  Insurance – Members were informed that the councils insurance policy was due to expire on 31st May 2021 therefore the Council will be required to test the market. Previously the Council used a specialist broker to take its proposal to market and it was suggested that a similar approach was taken this time around. It is anticipated this would not only achieve value for money but secure comprehensive policy coverage.

It was proposed to utilise the same brokers as previously Came & Company.

The proposal/submissions will then be brought back to council for consideration.

Members RESOLVED to approve the suggested approach.

129.2  Remote Meetings Members were advised that as a result in the government choosing not to extend the current legislation brought in last year (2020) to permit the continuance of remote meetings beyond the 7th May 2021 the Council will be required to revert back to in person meetings.

Representations are continuing to be made to government regarding this decision and a high court case is currently progressing seeking to allow the continuance of remote meetings.

It’s anticipated the outcome of this high court case will be known towards the end of April. The basis of the case relies on (1972 Local Government Act) which at the time of the legislation being made virtual meetings could not have been envisaged. The case therefore does not relate to the legislation specifically introduced last year to permit remote meetings.

At present authorities are being advised to prepare on the basis that remote meetings will cease on 7th May.

It was anticipated that if in person meetings were required the larger meetings such as Grounds & Environment Committee and Council meetings would be difficult to socially distance within the Council chamber in the Parish offices therefore alternative sites may need to be explored.

Members were informed that the Council was currently scheduled to hold its Annual Parish meeting and its Annual Council meeting on 11th May after the current legislation has ceased. The Clerk suggested that consideration be given to bringing both these meetings forward to 4th May to enable them to be held remotely. This appears to have been an approach taken by a large number of other authorities.

Council will then need to consider potential alternative sites to use for the larger meetings after the 7th May if the high court case proves unsuccessful.

The consensus amongst members was that they would be reluctant to recommence in person meetings at this present time therefore they RESOLVED to AGREE that the Annual Parish Meeting (7pm) and the Annual Council Meeting (7.30pm) should be brought forward to 4th May and held remotely.

Members also AGREED to revisit arrangements for the new municipal year once the outcome of the current court case was known.

129.3  Banking Members were advised that the Councils current providers (Barclays) branch based in Burgess Hill will close permanently on 21st June 2021.

It was therefore proposed to move the Councils day to day operational bank account over to Unity trust bank which has been set up specifically for parish councils and charities.

This is an online account only and to facilitate this move it was suggested that additional signatories should be identified for this account and it was important that any of the designated signatories are comfortable with technology.

The Clerk suggested that the council consider designating up to say six signatories.

Member’s views are sought. Members agreed to appoint designated signatories to assist in the setting up of the account. Cllr Weir sought volunteers to fulfil this role.

Members AGREED to appoint the following five signatories Cllr Ian Weir, Cllr Bill Hatton, Cllr Nick Owens, Cllr Leslie Campbell and Cllr Jane Baker.

129.4 Electoral Review MSDC are currently undergoing a boundary commission review where one of the options is to consider reducing the current membership down from 54 to 48 (Appendix 2 in the agenda set out some background on what an electoral review was and how to get involved).

Member’s views were sought on whether Hassocks Parish Council wished to put in a representation as part of the consultation.

For illustrative purposes, the Clerk had produced a series of tables using various data sets from the boundary commission’s website to illustrate the potential impact on representation numbers based on projected increases in electorate numbers.

The third table related specifically to Hassocks based on its existing ward structures and provided an indication of the level of growth in electorate over the forthcoming years.

Member’s views were sought. If members are minded to make a submission it should seek to identify representatives to do so.

Members expressed the view that the parish should make a submission to ensure regard is had for the existing geographical boundaries and the protection of the existing ward structure for the village, particularly in light of the anticipated growth in the village.

Members RESOLVED that a submission be drafted by the Clerk in consultation with Cllr Bill Hatton and Cllr Tester.

129.5  Parklands Copse Flood initiative – Grounds & Environment Committee agreed a proposal to install debris dams within Parklands Copse and sought approval from full council to secure £450 to undertake a survey to determine the viability of the installation.(GE20/74.1 and GE20/74.2).

A subsequent report was set out in Appendix 3 of this report seeking the allocation of a total budget of £1,000 to enable the scheme to progress without the need to come back to council (subject to survey) the funds would need to be released from general reserves. The attached report has been generated by a representative from the flood working group. Members agreed to the principle of this approach and RESOLVED to APPROVE the allocation of £1,000 from general reserves to support this initiative to enable the scheme to progress subject to survey.

PC20/130 Neighbourhood Plan Committee membership – members were requested to consider a request from Cllr Berggreen to sit on the Neighbourhood plan committee. Member’s views are sought.

Members RESOLVED to AGREE Cllr Berggreen joining the Neighbourhood Plan Committee.



To note that the date of the next Parish Council meeting is Tuesday 4th May 2021 at 7.30pm which will follow on from the Annual Parish meeting which will commence at 7pm.